ABSTRACT
Background: The unprecedented prevalence of olfactory disfunction (OD) by SARS-CoV- 2 has revealed the lack of specialized units dealing with sense of smell. The main objective of the study is to know the number of newly created olfactory units (OU) since the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to evaluate the diagnosis, management and treatment of patients with OD. Method(s): Prospective cross-sectional study. Carried out by means of a survey with 20 items: having or not having an OU, demographic data, smell test, evolution and management of OD, data on treatments. The variables of the survey were approved by the rhinology commission of the Spanish society of ENT. The digital survey was distributed to all members of Spanish ENT and Allergy Societies. Result(s): A total of 16 responses were missing data, and further 12 responses were duplicated. Finally, 136 surveys were included. From them 82.4% answers were from otolaryngologists and 17.7% from allergists. The cohort of allergists and otolaryngologists was compared to ensure comparability of both samples. There were significant differences in the instrumental assessment of the olfaction, VAS and smell test (p = 0.016) was more common in otolaryngologists. Also, the prescription of olfactory rehabilitation (OR) (p < 0.001) was more common in otolaryngologists. The 40.5% (+/- 7.6) of all the existent OU were created after COVID-19 pandemics. The 33.9% (+/- 4.5) of the respondent have an OU now, while 22.3% (+/- 3.9) already had it before COVID-19 pandemics. It means that 17% of hospitals who did not have an OU before COVID-19, now they have it, while 82.8% are still lacking it. OR was prescribed for 1-3 months by 38%;3-6 months by 48.1% and > 6 months by 13.9%. Those with an OU prescribe OR during more time (p = 0.002) being the most frequent answer 3-6 months (69.4%) when they have OU while 1-3 months (52.4%) for those who do not have it. Conclusion(s): This study revealed that COVID-19 pandemic has stimulated the creation of OU and has demonstrated the utility of OU to deal with patients with OD, as their daily practice is more adapted to up-to- date clinical evidence between allergist and otolaryngologists.
ABSTRACT
The aforementioned research gives us the opportunity to learn about motivational aspects of young people who attend preparatory education in virtual physical education classes. The young participants in this research are high school students and take physical education classes in each of their 6 semesters for the conclusion of upper secondary education, prior to their undergraduate studies, male and female participants aged between 15 and 19 years old at the time of the investigation, the classes in which the students participate are taught from Monday to Friday from 7H00 to 15H00. This schedule is the same in which they are carried out when the classes are in face-to-face format. The questionnaire applied was the Perceived Motivational Climate in Sport-2 (PMCSQ-2). The students who have been part of this research are regular students who participate in the classes of the 5 physical education teachers who work on campus and who teach their classes virtually or remotely.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most smell tests are difficult to implement in daily clinical practice owing to their long duration. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a short, easy-to-perform, and reusable smell test to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The study population comprised 120 healthy adults and 195 patients with self-reported olfactory dysfunction (OD). The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8) was used for detection, memory/recognition, and forced-choice identification. In addition, a rose threshold test was performed, and a visual analog scale was applied. The Smell Diskettes Olfaction Test (SDOT) was used for correlation in healthy volunteers, and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was used for patients with OD to establish cut-offs for anosmia and hyposmia. In order to take account of the COVID-19 pandemic, disposable cotton swabs with odorants were compared with the original test. RESULTS: In healthy persons, the mean (SD) BOT-8 score was 100% for detection, 94.5% (1.07) for memory/recognition, and 89.6% (0.86) for identification. In patients with OD, the equivalent values were 86% (32.8), 73.2% (37.9), and 77.1% (34.2), respectively. BOT-8 demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with agreement of 96.7% and a quadratic k of 0.84 (P<.001). A strong correlation was observed between BOT-8 and SDOT (r=0.67, P<.001) and UPSIT (r=0.86, P<.001). Agreement was excellent for disposable cotton swabs, with a k of 0.79 compared with the original test. The cut-off point for anosmia was ≤3 (area under the curve, 0.83; sensitivity, 0.673; specificity, 0.993). CONCLUSION: BOT-8 offers an efficient and fast method for assessment of smell threshold, detection, memory, and identification in daily clinical practice. Disposable cotton swabs with odorants proved to be useful and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.